OM-D E-M5 II
Olympus secret camera codes
by E B
If you ever wanted to know what secret information your Olympus camera is recording about itself, including things like number of shutter activations, flash activations, failure codes and many other things, the procedures outlined here will tell you:
Section 1 is mostly about the legacy cameras and Section 2 is mostly about the current cameras such as the OM-D series. If you choose to explore this information, be sure you have a fully charged battery in the camera and read the instructions carefully before you push any buttons.
by E B
As most of you know, if the focus of your lens is a little off, it can be corrected with an adjustment in your camera menu (menu A2-AF Focus adj on the O-MD E-M1 ii). Whether or not to do this has been a matter of interesting discussion on the other forum. A current and ongoing discussion of it is here;
And an even better discussion of some time ago is here:
Birds in flight
by E B
Perhaps the shortest and easiest explanation of how to capture images of birds in flight with an O-MD E-M1 is here published by Olympus itself:[SIZE=5][/SIZE]
by E B
I haven’t posted any pictures to the internet for the last ten years or so, so am out of touch in that respect. I believe I used to use Photobucket as a hosting site. Can anyone recommend any good hosting sites currently?
by E B
Some time ago I wrote lists of settings/instructions and explanations on how to set up the camera and FL-36/FL-50 flash to accomplish various lighting tasks. Those settings/instructions still exist and are in the Keepers section of this forum near the top. I'm pleased to find that the settings apply to the FL-900 flash unit and the current family of O-MD cameras. They probably apply to other Olympus cameras and flashes as well, but I haven't tested them.
by Guy Roberts
My current setup is an e5 with the following lenses: 7-14 f/4; 14-35 f/2; 14-54 mkii; 50-200swd; 50mm macro and 2x teleconverter.
Whan I travel I take only the 14-54mm, as I find the other lenses too big and heavy.
For this very reason I am thinking of going m4/3.
But thinking about it, the e5 is an excellent camera, takes images that I am very happy with, has less than 9000 shutter actuations, and is built like a tank.
So maybe a workaround would be to get the 9-18 f/4-5.6, used obviously.
With the teleconverter on the 14-54 I would be pretty much covered.
Looking on the net the 9-18mm lens seems to be holding its own price wise, around 300-400usd, depending on condition.
Anyone use this lens and have an opinion on it?
M.ZUIKO Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO lens and E5
Will this lens fit an E5? I have the 14-35 and 35-100 F2 4/3 lenses for theater photography. Wondered if the 12-40 the E5 body, it might make a good in between lens. Or should I just get the old 12-60 F2.8-4 online used?
I'm curious about the error code my E1 gives me when I press the shutter. Internet searches haven't been very useful. The screen shows
Older Olympus Camera Repair Recommendations
My gear is older Olympus (E-30, E-3 and E-1), which still produce excellent results (when they are functioning). The E-1 and E-30 need a bit of attention, and I hope some of you can recommend a non-Olympus (obviously) repair shop that is reliable and does excellent work. Yes, I know the cameras are old, and I can probably get another one on eBay, but it's always a gamble buying used. Sometimes it's good, and sometimes not. At least if I can get these repaired I know what I have. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
by Guy Roberts
Sony have just released a 400mm f2.8 lens to a lot of fanfare and good reviews. They speak to its low weight and balance and ease of use for long periods of time especially when compared to the Nikon and Canon alternatives.
The bodies used in one review were top pro and 20mp, so mp cannot be an issue to professional sports photographers.
I was wondering therefore, how the oly 300mm pro lens with the em1 mkII would stand up in this environment. It is smaller, lighter, maybe faster and a fraction of the cost. The only perceived negative could be the sensor size, but you get the same dpi prints and most images end up in newspapers or on line anyway.